A few days ago, the Jiangsu Provincial Administration for Market Regulation conducted supervision and random inspections on winter products such as down jackets, duvets, scarves, cotton jackets, jackets and cashmere sweaters. The results showed that among the 350 batches inspected, a total of 43 batches were found to be unqualified, with a failure rate of 12.3%. Products of many well-known brands were judged to be unqualified during supervisory inspections.
The filling in the down jacket samples is not down
Many well-known brands are quilted Roll call
This adult down jacket is marked as filled with 134 grams of down, but in actual testing it was only 90 grams, which is nearly one-third less.
This children’s down jacket has a nominal down content of 90%. In actual testing, it was only 3.3%, which is a false mark of nearly 30 times.
The reporter saw at the inspection site that not only did some down jackets have serious deviations in the amount of down, some of the fillings were not real down at all.
Inspectors said that the national standard stipulates that the main filling of down jackets is velvet with a velvet core structure. This kind of velvet can gather more air when stacked together, thus ensuring good quality. Thermal performance. As for the down jackets inspected, the fillings were mainly feather filaments formed by crushed feathers one by one, which had poor warmth retention properties.
△The left side of the picture is Duo Down/the right side of the picture is feather silk
The nominal down content is 80%, the actual content is 1.7%
Inspector: This is the worst down jacket I have ever seen
The reporter observed that during this spot inspection, unqualified children The quality of down jackets is even more worrying.
A thickened children’s down jacket labeled as “Youcati” brand purchased from an e-commerce platform clearly states that the down content is 80% white duck down, but the actual data is quite different. Far.
Shen Hua, Assistant Engineer of the Inspection Department of Suzhou Fiber Inspection Institute: Its down content is only 1.7%, and it is all silk fallen from feathers. This is almost the worst down jacket I have ever tested.
After testing, 8 batches of adult down jackets were found to be unqualified, including samples labeled as Xuezhongfei brand, Rongmei brand, Ailangshi brand, Bingjie brand and so on.
11 batches of children’s down jackets are unqualified, including those labeled as Eucati brand, Gumi Bear brand, Mian Xiaoban brand, Little Sailor brand, etc.
The down quilt sample failed in many indicators
It cannot even be called a “down quilt”
During this supervision and spot inspection, some duvets purchased from e-commerce platforms had completely different fillings in their nominal fillings and actual fillings.
Qian Weiwei, senior engineer at Nantong Fiber Inspection Institute: This quilt is claimed to be 100% goose down, but in fact, after testing, it was found that there was no goose down at all inside.
This duvet purchased from the live broadcast platform and labeled as “Shanghai Yiting Textile Technology Co., Ltd.” failed in four indicators, including fiber content and down. Content, duck down content and bulkiness, that is, fabric and filling, are all unqualified.
Qian Weiwei, senior engineer of Nantong Fiber Inspection Institute: The nominal down content on the tag is 95%, but the test result is only 7.8%. Strictly speaking, even the down quilt has Not really. National standards require that the down content must be greater than or equal to 50% to be called a down quilt.
The test samples were labeled as “substandard” raw materials
Randomly labeled as “fiber content”
In this supervision and spot inspection, some manufacturing companies labeled raw materials as “substandard products”, which is the main quality problem of substandard products.
The tag states that it contains 96% wool, but there is actually no wool at all.
After testing 40 batches of scarves, it was found that there was no When qualified products are marked with fiber content, most of them falsely label some cheap chemical fiber ingredients as more expensive raw materials such as wool or cashmere.
Zhang Dandan, engineer of the Inspection Department of Suzhou Fiber Inspection Institute: The tag of this scarf shows that it is 96% wool, but the actual measurement is 100% polyester fiber. A single piece of wool is No.
After testing, the unqualified scarves included 10 batches of scarves with brands such as Septwolves, Leiguobao and Bairuiou.
100% polyester fiber actual 100% nylon
Test results of 50 batches of cotton clothing It shows that manufacturing companies have a high level of confidence in the fiber content of clothing.��Random and random labeling is another quality problem of substandard products.
Fiber content is an important reference indicator for consumers to purchase clothing. It is related to consumers’ wearing experience and performance, and is also closely related to the washing requirements and methods of clothing.
Chen Fei, engineer of Changzhou Fiber Inspection Institute: It is labeled as 100% polyester fiber, but it is actually 100% nylon. Nylon is a fiber with relatively good wear resistance and is commonly used in socks and other clothing.
After testing, the unqualified cotton clothes include 10 batches of brands named VERO MODA Visaman, Hengyuanxiang, and Ziyixiu.
Many well-known brand products have been judged to be unqualified
Three Nos. The products are all from e-commerce live streaming platforms
Products from many well-known brands were judged to be unqualified in this supervisory inspection:
The “Xue Zhongfei” brand adult down jacket nominally produced by Xuezhongfei Industrial Co., Ltd. failed to meet the standards for down content, down content and bulkiness;
The nominal The “Septwolves” brand scarves produced for Tongxiang Zhuoma Clothing Co., Ltd. have unqualified fiber content;
The “VERO MODA” brand scarves produced by Lingzhi Fashion (Tianjin) Co., Ltd. are labeled “Shaman” brand cotton clothing, the fiber content is unqualified.
In addition, this time, more than 10 e-commerce platforms were used to purchase samples, including JD.com, Tmall, Suning.com, Vipshop, and Xiaomi Youpin, Taobao Live, Tmall Live, Douyin, Kuaishou, Xiaohongshu, etc.
In this spot inspection of down quilts, the testing agency plans to purchase 25 batches of samples. Among the samples purchased on one e-commerce live streaming platform alone, there were 4 batches of three-no products.
In this supervision and spot inspection, the three-no products received by the testing agency all came from the e-commerce live broadcast platform. In this regard, the market supervision department stated that it will increase supervision of such sales channels and platforms. </p
